PGN-Engine-Analyzer variations file:
F:\Documents\AutoIt\PGN-Engine-Analyzer\ZIP-Ordner\PGN\English\games_engine_variations.pgn
from 22 December 2024 07:25
analysis date: 15 March 2025 09:08


⇓ game 1 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓


Robert Steel ./. NN 
result: 1-0


game 1
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings player White player Black
name Robert Steel NN

⇑ game 1 — player data ⇑


⇓ game 1 — probabilistic game results ⇓


Robert Steel ./. NN 
result: 1-0


game 1
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings information
event/source/work Calcutta
site Calcutta IND
date 1886.??.??
result 1-0
ECO C25
annotator Stockfish dev-20241208-cf10644d
scheme move evaluation 7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation 9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75 1.190 [112x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875 1.749 [124x]
variations: general parameters 4 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 1 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter depth 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1

⇑ game 1 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑


⇓ game 1 — engine evaluated moves ⇓


Robert Steel ./. NN 
result: 1-0


game 1
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White



⇑ game 1 — probabilistic game results ⇑


⇓ game 1 — statistics ⇓


Robert Steel ./. NN 
result: 1-0


game 1
engine-evaluated moves
game no. move no.     game move      multi/
single
mode
game move
= variation
x
move
evaluation
source
search
depth
hm
tablebase
hits
evaluation
real
move
win
probability
WDL
draw
probability
WDL
loss
probability
WDL
position
evaluation
symbol
probab.
game
result
evaluation
optimal
move
evaluation
2nd best
move
gain/
loss
absolute
gain/
loss
relevant
move
evaluation
symbol
optimum
rate
optimum
rate
Ø
losses

absolute
losses
Ø
absolute
losses

relevant
losses
Ø
relevant
move no.     game move      multi/
single
mode
game move
= x.variation
move
evaluation
source
search
depth
hm
tablebase
hits
evaluation
real
move
win
probability
WDL
draw
probability
WDL
loss
probability
WDL
position
evaluation
symbol
probab.
game
result
evaluation
optimal
move
evaluation
2nd best
move
gain/
loss
absolute
gain/
loss
relevant
move
evaluation
symbol
optimum
rate
optimum
rate
Ø
losses

absolute
losses
Ø
absolute
losses

relevant
losses
Ø
relevant
1 1 1. e4 M 3 → 2. Nf3 30 0.20 7.6% 90.1% 2.3% ⩲  +/= 53% 0.33 0.32 ‑0.13 ‑0.12 95.79% 95.79% 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 1 1... e5 M 1 → 2. Nf3 30 0.20 2.3% 90.1% 7.6% ⩲  +/= 53% 0.19 0.32 ‑0.01 ‑0.01 99.67% 99.67% 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
1 2 2. Nc3 M 3 → 3. Bc4 30 0.19 7.4% 90.3% 2.3% ⩲  +/= 53% 0.20 0.18 ‑0.01 ‑0.01 99.67% 97.73% 0.14 0.07 0.13 0.07 2 2... Nc6 M 1 → 3. Bc4 30 0.19 2.3% 90.3% 7.4% ⩲  +/= 53% 0.19 0.25 0.06 0.06 100.00% 99.84% 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
1 3 3. f4 ?! M >4 → 5... g5 30 ‑0.31 1.4% 88.8% 9.8% ⩱  =/+ 46% 0.19 0.14 ‑0.50 ‑0.48 ?! 81.44% 92.30% 0.64 0.21 0.61 0.20 3 3... exf4 !? M 1 → 5... g5 30 ‑0.31 9.8% 88.8% 1.4% ⩱  =/+ 46% ‑0.31 0.09 0.40 0.39 !? 100.00% 99.89% 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
1 4 4. d4 !? M 1 → 5... g5 30 ‑0.31 1.4% 88.8% 9.8% ⩱  =/+ 46% ‑0.31 ‑0.63 0.32 0.27 !? 100.00% 94.23% 0.64 0.16 0.61 0.15 4 4... Qh4+ M 1 → 5... g5 30 ‑0.31 9.8% 88.8% 1.4% ⩱  =/+ 46% ‑0.31 ‑0.22 0.09 0.08 100.00% 99.92% 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
1 5 5. Ke2 !! M 1 → 5... g5 30 ‑0.31 1.4% 88.8% 9.8% ⩱  =/+ 46% ‑0.31 ‑2.83 2.52 1.00 !! 100.00% 95.38% 0.64 0.13 0.61 0.12 5 5... d5 ? M >4 → 7... Bxf3+ 30 0.59 0.5% 78.8% 20.7% ±  +/- 60% ‑0.31 ‑0.28 ‑0.90 ‑0.83 ? 67.16% 93.37% 0.91 0.18 0.84 0.17
1 6 6. exd5 !? M 1 → 7... Bxf3+ 30 0.59 20.7% 78.8% 0.5% ±  +/- 60% 0.59 0.23 0.36 0.31 !? 100.00% 96.15% 0.64 0.11 0.61 0.10 6 6... Bg4+ !? M 1 → 7... Bxf3+ 30 0.59 0.5% 78.8% 20.7% ±  +/- 60% 0.59 0.98 0.39 0.26 !? 100.00% 94.47% 0.91 0.15 0.84 0.14
1 7 7. Nf3 !! M 1 → 7... Bxf3+ 30 0.59 20.7% 78.8% 0.5% ±  +/- 60% 0.59 ‑6.19 6.78 1.81 !! 100.00% 96.70% 0.64 0.09 0.61 0.09 7 7... O‑O‑O M >4 → 9. Qe1 30 0.62 0.3% 79.3% 20.4% ±  +/- 60% 0.59 1.28 ‑0.03 ‑0.02 99.06% 95.13% 0.94 0.13 0.86 0.12
1 8 8. dxc6 !! M 1 → 9. Qe1 30 0.62 20.4% 79.3% 0.3% ±  +/- 60% 0.62 ‑1.38 2.00 1.50 !! 100.00% 97.11% 0.64 0.08 0.61 0.08 8 8... Bc5 !? M 1 → 9. Qe1 30 0.62 0.3% 79.3% 20.4% ±  +/- 60% 0.62 1.12 0.50 0.30 !? 100.00% 95.74% 0.94 0.12 0.86 0.11
1 9 9. cxb7+ ?? M 3 → 10... Bxf3+ 30 ‑0.59 0.3% 81.6% 18.1% ∓  -/+ 41% 0.62 0.00 ‑1.21 ‑1.10 ?? 57.17% 92.67% 1.85 0.21 1.71 0.19 9 9... Kb8 !! M 1 → 10... Bxf3+ 30 ‑0.59 18.1% 81.6% 0.3% ∓  -/+ 41% ‑0.59 1.96 2.55 1.66 !! 100.00% 96.21% 0.94 0.10 0.86 0.10
1 10 10. Nb5 !? M 1 → 10... Bxf3+ 30 ‑0.59 0.3% 81.6% 18.1% ∓  -/+ 41% ‑0.59 ‑1.48 0.89 0.43 !? 100.00% 93.41% 1.85 0.19 1.71 0.17 10 10... Nf6 ?? M 2 → 12... Qf2 30 14 1.06 0.0% 44.1% 55.9% +- 78% ‑0.59 1.06 ‑1.65 ‑1.37 ?? 43.21% 90.91% 2.59 0.26 2.23 0.22
1 11 11. c3 !! M 1 → 12... Qf2 30 14 1.06 55.9% 44.1% 0.0% +- 78% 1.06 ‑0.47 1.53 1.27 !! 100.00% 94.01% 1.85 0.17 1.71 0.16 11 11... Rhe8+ M 1 → 12... Qf2 30 14 1.06 0.0% 44.1% 55.9% ++- 78% 1.06 1.29 0.23 0.08 100.00% 91.74% 2.59 0.24 2.23 0.20
1 12 12. Kd3 ! M 1 → 12... Qf2 30 14 1.06 55.9% 44.1% 0.0% +- 78% 1.06 0.00 1.06 0.76 ! 100.00% 94.51% 1.85 0.15 1.71 0.14 12 12... Bf5+ ?! M 2 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% ++- 100% 1.06 2.36 ‑1.30 ‑0.29 ?! 86.33% 91.29% 3.89 0.32 2.52 0.21
1 13 13. Kc4 !! M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 99.9% 0.1% 0.0% ++- 100% 2.36 ‑2.75 5.11 2.36 !! 100.00% 94.93% 1.85 0.14 1.71 0.13 13 13... Be6+ M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% ++- 100% 2.16 2.69 ‑0.20 0.00 99.93% 91.95% 4.09 0.31 2.52 0.19
1 14 14. Kxc5 ! M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 99.9% 0.1% 0.0% ++- 100% 2.36 0.49 1.87 0.82 ! 100.00% 95.29% 1.85 0.13 1.71 0.12 14 14... a5 M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% ++- 100% 2.36 2.80 0.44 0.00 100.00% 92.53% 4.09 0.29 2.52 0.18
1 15 15. Nxc7 !! M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 99.9% 0.1% 0.0% ++- 100% 2.36 ‑6.59 8.95 2.36 !! 100.00% 95.60% 1.85 0.12 1.71 0.11 15 15... Qh5+ M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% ++- 100% 2.36 4.63 2.27 0.00 100.00% 93.02% 4.09 0.27 2.52 0.17
1 16 16. Ne5 !! M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 99.9% 0.1% 0.0% ++- 100% 2.36 ‑2.87 5.23 2.36 !! 100.00% 95.88% 1.85 0.12 1.71 0.11 16 16... Nd7+ M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% ++- 100% 2.36 3.12 0.76 0.00 100.00% 93.46% 4.09 0.26 2.52 0.16
1 17 17. Kb5 !! M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 99.9% 0.1% 0.0% ++- 100% 2.36 ‑4.46 6.82 2.36 !! 100.00% 96.12% 1.85 0.11 1.71 0.10 17 17... Qxd1 M 1 → 18. Nxd7+ 30 376 2.36 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% ++- 100% 2.36 4.18 1.82 0.00 100.00% 93.84% 4.09 0.24 2.52 0.15
1 18 18. Bxf4 ?? M >4 → 20... Rd5 30 1084 ‑4.90 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% 2.36 ‑1.74 ‑7.26 ‑2.30 ?? 0.00% 90.78% 9.11 0.51 4.01 0.22 18 18... Qxa1 !! M 1 → 20... Rd5 30 1084 ‑4.90 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑4.90 0.00 4.90 1.15 !! 100.00% 94.19% 4.09 0.23 2.52 0.14
1 19 19. Ka6 M 1 → 20... Rd5 30 1084 ‑4.90 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑4.90 ‑5.67 0.77 0.00 100.00% 91.27% 9.11 0.48 4.01 0.21 19 19... Nxe5 !! M 1 → 20... Rd5 30 1084 ‑4.90 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑4.90 1.80 6.70 1.83 !! 100.00% 94.49% 4.09 0.22 2.52 0.13
1 20 20. Nxe8 M 1 → 20... Rd5 30 1084 ‑4.90 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑4.90 ‑6.48 1.58 0.00 100.00% 91.70% 9.11 0.46 4.01 0.20 20 20... f6 ?? M 2 → 21... g5 30 79 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% ‑4.90 0.00 ‑4.90 ‑1.15 ?? 50.00% 92.27% 8.99 0.45 3.67 0.18
1 21 21. dxe5 !! M 1 → 21... g5 30 79 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 ‑5.74 5.74 1.15 !! 100.00% 92.10% 9.11 0.43 4.01 0.19 21 21... f5 M 2 → 23. Ba7+ 30 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 92.64% 8.99 0.43 3.67 0.17
1 22 22. Be3 M 1 → 23. Ba7+ 30 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 92.46% 9.11 0.41 4.01 0.18 22 22... Rxe8 !! M 1 → 23. Ba7+ 30 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 7.37 7.37 1.14 !! 100.00% 92.97% 8.99 0.41 3.67 0.17
1 23 23. Bb5 M 2 → 25. Bb6+ 29 ‑ 30 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 92.79% 9.11 0.40 4.01 0.17 23 23... Qxh1 !! M 1 → 25. Bb6+ 29 ‑ 30 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 2.01 2.01 1.01 !! 100.00% 93.28% 8.99 0.39 3.67 0.16
1 24 24. Ba7+ M 1 → 25. Bb6+ 29 ‑ 30 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 93.09% 9.11 0.38 4.01 0.17 24 24... Kc7 S 1 → 25. Bb6+ 29 ‑ 30 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 ≧ 0.00 ≧ 0.00 100.00% 93.56% 8.99 0.37 3.67 0.15
1 25 25. Bc5 M 2 → 25... Rc8 30 83268 0.00 0.3% 99.4% 0.3% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 93.36% 9.11 0.36 4.01 0.16 25 25... Rd8 ?? M >4 → 26... Qg1 30 299.95 M3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 0.00 0.00 ‑299.95 ‑1.14 ?? 50.00% 91.81% 308.94 12.36 4.81 0.19
1 26 26. Ka7 !! M 1 → 26... Qg1 30 299.95 M3 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 299.96 M2 0.00 299.95 1.14 !! 100.00% 93.62% 9.11 0.35 4.01 0.15 26 26... h6 M >4 → 27. Bb6# 30 299.99 M1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 299.96 M2 299.98 M1 ‑0.03 0.00 100.00% 92.13% 308.97 11.88 4.81 0.19
1 27 27. Bb6# M 1 30 300.00 M0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 300.00 M0 299.98 M1 0.02 0.00 100.00% 93.85% 9.11 0.34 4.01 0.15

⇑ game 1 — engine evaluated moves ⇑


⇓ game 2 — player data ⇓


Robert Steel ./. NN 
result: 1-0


game 1
statistics
type player White player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation 27 26
moves without precise engine evaluation
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00 22 17
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00 5 9
brilliant moves !! 10 5
impressive moves ! 2
attractive moves !? 3 3
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00 2 5
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00 7 8
questionable moves ?! 1 1
unsuitable moves ? 1
miserable moves ?? 2 3
extreme advantage — of White: ++- — of Black: --+ 7 2
clear advantage — of White: +- — of Black: -+ 2
moderate advantage — of White: ± — of Black: ∓ 3 1
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱ 2 2
balanced position or draw — engine evaluation = 0.00 — = 5 5
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲ 3 2
moderate disadvantage — of White: ∓ — of Black: ± 2 4
clear disadvantage — of White: -+ — of Black: +- 1
extreme disadvantage — of White: --+ — of Black: ++- 3 9
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move« 300.00 M0 299.99 M1
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL« 100.0% 0.0%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL« 0.0% 0.0%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL« 0.0% 100.0%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol« ++- ++-
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result« 100% 100%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø« 93.85% 92.13%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute« 9.11 308.97
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute« 0.34 11.88
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant« 4.01 4.81
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant« 0.15 0.19
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis 27 26

⇑ game 1 — statistics ⇑


⇓ game 2 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓


Christophe van de Loo ./. M Hesseling 
result: 1-0


game 2
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings player White player Black
name Christophe van de Loo M Hesseling

⇑ game 2 — player data ⇑


⇓ game 2 — probabilistic game results ⇓


Christophe van de Loo ./. M Hesseling 
result: 1-0


game 2
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings information
event/source/work Weekend Tournament, Holland
site *
date 1983.??.??
result 1-0
ECO C57
annotator Stockfish dev-20241208-cf10644d
number of plies 95
scheme move evaluation 7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation 9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75 1.166 [195x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875 1.761 [189x]
variations: general parameters 4 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 1 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter depth 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1

⇑ game 2 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑


⇓ game 2 — engine evaluated moves ⇓


Christophe van de Loo ./. M Hesseling 
result: 1-0


game 2
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White



⇑ game 2 — probabilistic game results ⇑


⇓ game 2 — statistics ⇓


Christophe van de Loo ./. M Hesseling 
result: 1-0


game 2
engine-evaluated moves
game no. move no.     game move      multi/
single
mode
game move
= variation
x
move
evaluation
source
search
depth
hm
tablebase
hits
evaluation
real
move
win
probability
WDL
draw
probability
WDL
loss
probability
WDL
position
evaluation
symbol
probab.
game
result
evaluation
optimal
move
evaluation
2nd best
move
gain/
loss
absolute
gain/
loss
relevant
move
evaluation
symbol
optimum
rate
optimum
rate
Ø
losses

absolute
losses
Ø
absolute
losses

relevant
losses
Ø
relevant
move no.     game move      multi/
single
mode
game move
= x.variation
move
evaluation
source
search
depth
hm
tablebase
hits
evaluation
real
move
win
probability
WDL
draw
probability
WDL
loss
probability
WDL
position
evaluation
symbol
probab.
game
result
evaluation
optimal
move
evaluation
2nd best
move
gain/
loss
absolute
gain/
loss
relevant
move
evaluation
symbol
optimum
rate
optimum
rate
Ø
losses

absolute
losses
Ø
absolute
losses

relevant
losses
Ø
relevant
2 1 1. e4 M 3 → 3. Bb5 30 0.26 9.0% 89.1% 1.9% ⩲  +/= 54% 0.33 0.32 ‑0.07 ‑0.06 97.75% 97.75% 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 1 1... e5 M 1 → 3. Bb5 30 0.26 1.9% 89.1% 9.0% ⩲  +/= 54% 0.26 0.32 0.06 0.06 100.00% 100.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 2 2. Nf3 M 1 → 3. Bb5 30 0.26 9.0% 89.1% 1.9% ⩲  +/= 54% 0.26 0.11 0.15 0.14 100.00% 98.88% 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.03 2 2... Nc6 M 1 → 3. Bb5 30 0.26 1.9% 89.1% 9.0% ⩲  +/= 54% 0.26 0.39 0.13 0.12 100.00% 100.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 3 3. Bc4 M 2 → 4. d3 30 0.14 6.4% 90.9% 2.7% = 52% 0.26 0.14 ‑0.12 ‑0.11 96.02% 97.92% 0.19 0.06 0.17 0.06 3 3... Nf6 M 1 → 4. d3 30 0.14 2.7% 90.9% 6.4% = 52% 0.14 0.20 0.06 0.06 100.00% 100.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 4 4. Ng5 M 2 → 4... d5 30 0.03 4.6% 91.6% 3.8% = 50% 0.14 0.03 ‑0.11 ‑0.11 96.20% 97.49% 0.30 0.08 0.28 0.07 4 4... Bc5 ?? M 2 → 5. Bxf7+ 30 1.24 0.1% 32.2% 67.7% +- 84% 0.03 1.24 ‑1.21 ‑0.80 ?? 62.84% 90.71% 1.21 0.30 0.80 0.20
2 5 5. Nxf7 ?? M 3 → 7... Qh4 30 1 0.00 2.5% 95.1% 2.4% = 50% 1.24 0.81 ‑1.24 ‑0.82 ?? 61.50% 90.29% 1.54 0.31 1.10 0.22 5 5... Bxf2+ !! M 1 → 7... Qh4 30 1 0.00 2.5% 95.1% 2.4% = 50% 0.00 2.37 2.37 1.20 !! 100.00% 92.57% 1.21 0.24 0.80 0.16
2 6 6. Kxf2 M 1 → 7... Qh4 30 1 0.00 2.5% 95.1% 2.4% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 91.91% 1.54 0.26 1.10 0.18 6 6... Nxe4+ !! M 1 → 7... Qh4 30 1 0.00 2.5% 95.1% 2.4% = 50% 0.00 3.31 3.31 1.31 !! 100.00% 93.81% 1.21 0.20 0.80 0.13
2 7 7. Ke3 M 1 → 7... Qh4 30 1 0.00 2.5% 95.1% 2.4% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 93.07% 1.54 0.22 1.10 0.16 7 7... Qe7 ?? M 2 → 8. Nxh8 30 1.47 0.0% 14.8% 85.2% ++- 93% 0.00 1.47 ‑1.47 ‑0.84 ?? 54.22% 88.15% 2.68 0.38 1.64 0.23
2 8 8. c3 ?? M 4 → 8... Rf8 30 ‑2.78 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% --+ 0% 1.47 0.21 ‑4.25 ‑1.78 ?? 5.06% 82.07% 5.79 0.72 2.88 0.36 8 8... Nd4 ?? M >4 → 9. d3 30 2.60 0.0% 0.3% 99.7% ++- 100% ‑2.78 ‑2.59 ‑5.38 ‑2.61 ?? 0.01% 77.13% 8.06 1.01 4.25 0.53
2 9 9. Kxe4 ?? M >4 → 9... d5+ 30 ‑3.11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% 2.60 0.99 ‑5.71 ‑2.52 ?? 0.00% 72.95% 11.50 1.28 5.40 0.60 9 9... Qh4+ ?! M 2 → 10. Kd3 30 ‑1.29 76.0% 24.0% 0.0% --+ 12% ‑3.11 ‑1.29 ‑1.82 ‑0.15 ?! 92.21% 78.81% 9.88 1.10 4.40 0.49
2 10 10. Ke3 ?! M 2 → 11... Qf5+ 30 ‑4.24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑1.29 ‑4.24 ‑2.95 ‑0.15 ?! 92.21% 74.87% 14.45 1.44 5.55 0.56 10 10... Qf4+ M 1 → 11... Qf5+ 30 ‑4.24 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑4.24 ‑1.86 2.38 0.01 100.00% 80.93% 9.88 0.99 4.40 0.44
2 11 11. Kd3 S 1 → 11... Qf5+ 30 ‑4.24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑4.24 ≧ 0.00 ≧ 0.00 100.00% 77.16% 14.45 1.31 5.55 0.50 11 11... d5 M 2 → 12. cxd4 30 ‑4.30 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑4.30 ‑4.24 0.06 0.00 100.00% 82.66% 9.88 0.90 4.40 0.40
2 12 12. Bxd5 M >4 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑4.30 ‑4.33 ‑3.09 0.00 100.00% 79.06% 17.54 1.46 5.55 0.46 12 12... Bf5+ !! M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 1.33 8.72 1.72 !! 100.00% 84.11% 9.88 0.82 4.40 0.37
2 13 13. Kc4 M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 ‑299.93 ‑M4 292.54 0.00 100.00% 80.67% 17.54 1.35 5.55 0.43 13 13... b5+ !! M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 ‑0.31 7.08 1.00 !! 100.00% 85.33% 9.88 0.76 4.40 0.34
2 14 14. Kc5 M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 ‑7.64 0.25 0.00 100.00% 82.05% 17.54 1.25 5.55 0.40 14 14... Qh4 M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 ‑3.45 3.94 0.00 100.00% 86.38% 9.88 0.71 4.40 0.31
2 15 15. Nxe5 M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 ‑9.48 2.09 0.00 100.00% 83.25% 17.54 1.17 5.55 0.37 15 15... O‑O‑O ! M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 ‑0.74 6.65 0.62 ! 100.00% 87.29% 9.88 0.66 4.40 0.29
2 16 16. c4 M 1 → 16... Rhe8 30 182 ‑7.39 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑7.39 ‑299.83 ‑M9 292.44 0.00 100.00% 84.30% 17.54 1.10 5.55 0.35 16 16... Rxd5+ M 2 → 18... a5 30 3 ‑299.52 ‑M24 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑299.53 ‑M24 ‑7.39 292.13 0.00 100.00% 88.08% 9.88 0.62 4.40 0.28
2 17 17. cxd5 M 1 → 18... a5 30 3 ‑299.52 ‑M24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑299.53 ‑M24 ‑299.91 ‑M5 0.39 0.00 100.00% 85.22% 17.54 1.03 5.55 0.33 17 17... Rd8 M 1 → 18... a5 30 3 ‑299.52 ‑M24 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑299.53 ‑M24 ‑7.48 292.04 0.00 100.00% 88.78% 9.88 0.58 4.40 0.26
2 18 18. Nc3 M 1 → 18... a5 30 3 ‑299.52 ‑M24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑299.53 ‑M24 ‑299.83 ‑M9 0.31 0.00 100.00% 86.04% 17.54 0.97 5.55 0.31 18 18... Nc6 M >4 → 19. Qg4 30 64 ‑1.52 92.5% 7.5% 0.0% --+ 4% ‑299.53 ‑M24 ‑9.87 ‑298.01 ‑0.03 98.21% 89.31% 307.89 17.11 4.43 0.25
2 19 19. Qa4 M 2 → 20... Nxe5 30 17 ‑5.90 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑1.52 ‑5.90 ‑4.38 ‑0.03 98.11% 86.68% 21.92 1.15 5.58 0.29 19 19... Qe7+ M 1 → 20... Nxe5 30 17 ‑5.90 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% --+ 0% ‑5.90 ‑4.41 1.49 0.00 100.00% 89.87% 307.89 16.20 4.43 0.23
2 20 20. Kxb5 M 1 → 20... Nxe5 30 17 ‑5.90 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% ‑5.90 ‑7.75 1.85 0.00 100.00% 87.34% 21.92 1.10 5.58 0.28 20 20... Qxe5 ?? M 2 → 21. Qa6+ 30 14 1.02 0.0% 47.9% 52.1% +- 76% ‑5.90 1.02 ‑6.92 ‑1.83 ?? 15.03% 86.13% 314.81 15.74 6.26 0.31
2 21 21. Qc4 ?! M 2 → 21... Qd6 30 137 0.63 13.1% 86.9% 0.0% ±  +/- 57% 1.02 0.63 ‑0.39 ‑0.26 ?! 88.82% 87.41% 22.31 1.06 5.84 0.28 21 21... Nd4+ ? M >4 → 22. Ka5 30 6 2.23 0.0% 0.2% 99.8% ++- 100% 0.63 0.79 ‑1.60 ‑0.70 ? 72.90% 85.50% 316.41 15.07 6.96 0.33
2 22 22. Ka4 ?? M 2 → 24. Ka4 30 4 0.00 0.6% 98.8% 0.6% = 50% 2.23 0.00 ‑2.23 ‑1.12 ?? 50.01% 85.71% 24.54 1.12 6.96 0.32 22 22... Bd7+ !! M 1 → 24. Ka4 30 4 0.00 0.6% 98.8% 0.6% = 50% 0.00 1.57 1.57 0.82 !! 100.00% 86.16% 316.41 14.38 6.96 0.32
2 23 23. Ka5 M 1 → 24. Ka4 30 4 0.00 0.6% 98.8% 0.6% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 86.33% 24.54 1.07 6.96 0.30 23 23... Nc6+ !! M 1 → 24. Ka4 30 4 0.00 0.6% 98.8% 0.6% = 50% 0.00 1.79 1.79 0.91 !! 100.00% 86.76% 316.41 13.76 6.96 0.30
2 24 24. Ka6 M 2 → 25. Ka5 30 0.00 0.6% 98.8% 0.6% = 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 86.90% 24.54 1.02 6.96 0.29 24 24... Nb8+ !! M 1 → 25. Ka5 30 0.00 0.6% 98.8% 0.6% = 50% 0.00 1.19 1.19 0.76 !! 100.00% 87.31% 316.41 13.18 6.96 0.29
2 25 25. Kxa7 ?? M 2 → 25... Qd6 30 576 ‑299.90 ‑M5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% 0.00 ‑299.91 ‑M5 ‑299.90 ‑1.18 ?? 50.00% 85.43% 324.44 12.98 8.14 0.33 25 25... c6 ?? M >4 → 26... Be8 30 12538 2.68 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% ‑299.91 ‑M5 ‑299.83 ‑M9 ‑302.59 ‑2.36 ?? 0.00% 83.82% 619.00 24.76 9.32 0.37
2 26 26. Nb5 !! M 1 → 26... Be8 30 12538 2.68 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 2.68 ‑299.79 ‑M11 302.47 2.36 !! 100.00% 85.99% 324.44 12.48 8.14 0.31 26 26... Bf5 M 2 → 27. dxc6 30 9404 5.45 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 2.68 5.45 ‑2.77 0.00 100.00% 84.44% 621.77 23.91 9.32 0.36
2 27 27. d4 M 3 → 27... Qe7+ 30 968 2.00 99.5% 0.5% 0.0% ++- 100% 5.45 4.22 ‑3.45 0.00 99.96% 86.51% 327.89 12.14 8.14 0.30 27 27... Rd7+ M 3 → 28... Qxd5 30 22603 7.03 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 2.00 4.30 ‑5.03 0.00 99.96% 85.01% 626.80 23.21 9.32 0.35
2 28 28. Ka8 M 1 → 28... Qxd5 30 22603 7.03 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 7.03 5.64 1.39 0.00 100.00% 86.99% 327.89 11.71 8.14 0.29 28 28... Qe7 M >4 → 29. Bf4 30 1235 8.05 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 7.03 7.10 ‑1.02 0.00 100.00% 85.55% 627.82 22.42 9.32 0.33
2 29 29. dxc6 M 2 → 30. Qg8+ 30 3804 5.02 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 8.05 5.02 ‑3.03 0.00 100.00% 87.44% 330.92 11.41 8.14 0.28 29 29... Be4 M 1 → 30. Qg8+ 30 3804 5.02 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 5.02 9.06 4.04 0.00 100.00% 86.05% 627.82 21.65 9.32 0.32
2 30 30. d5 M 2 → 33. Re1 30 12073 5.25 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 5.25 5.02 0.23 0.00 100.00% 87.85% 330.92 11.03 8.14 0.27 30 30... Bxd5 M 1 → 33. Re1 30 12073 5.25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 5.25 8.17 2.92 0.00 100.00% 86.51% 627.82 20.93 9.32 0.31
2 31 31. Qxd5 !! M 1 → 33. Re1 30 12073 5.25 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 5.25 ‑299.73 ‑M14 304.98 2.35 !! 100.00% 88.25% 330.92 10.67 8.14 0.26 31 31... Rxd5 M 1 → 33. Re1 30 12073 5.25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 5.25 14.84 9.59 0.00 100.00% 86.95% 627.82 20.25 9.32 0.30
2 32 32. Na7+ !! M 1 → 33. Re1 30 12073 5.25 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 5.25 ‑2.37 7.62 2.30 !! 100.00% 88.61% 330.92 10.34 8.14 0.25 32 32... Kd8 M 1 → 33. Re1 30 12073 5.25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 4.97 6.42 ‑0.28 0.00 100.00% 87.36% 628.10 19.63 9.32 0.29
2 33 33. Kxb8 ?? M >4 → 33... Qb4+ 30 41262 ‑299.88 ‑M6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% --+ 0% 5.25 4.22 ‑305.13 ‑2.28 ?? 0.00% 85.93% 636.05 19.27 10.42 0.32 33 33... Qc7+ ?? M >4 → 34... Ke8 30 25215 5.01 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% ‑299.89 ‑M6 ‑6.99 ‑304.90 ‑2.28 ?? 0.00% 84.71% 933.00 28.27 11.60 0.35
2 34 34. Ka8 S 1 → 34... Ke8 30 25215 5.01 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 5.01 ≧ 0.00 ≧ 0.00 100.00% 86.34% 636.05 18.71 10.42 0.31 34 34... Ra5 M 2 → 36. Rhe1 30 12884 6.88 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 5.01 6.88 ‑1.87 0.00 100.00% 85.16% 934.87 27.50 11.60 0.34
2 35 35. Bg5+ !! M 1 → 36. Rhe1 30 12884 6.88 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 6.88 ‑299.85 ‑M8 306.73 2.29 !! 100.00% 86.73% 636.05 18.17 10.42 0.30 35 35... Rxg5 M 1 → 36. Rhe1 30 12884 6.88 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 6.88 8.65 1.77 0.00 100.00% 85.58% 934.87 26.71 11.60 0.33
2 36 36. Rad1+ M 3 → 36... Ke7 30 12432 6.80 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 6.88 6.68 ‑0.08 0.00 100.00% 87.10% 636.13 17.67 10.42 0.29 36 36... Ke8 M 2 → 38... Qf4 30 10023 6.99 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 6.80 6.99 ‑0.19 0.00 100.00% 85.98% 935.06 25.97 11.60 0.32
2 37 37. Rhe1+ M 1 → 38... Qf4 30 10023 6.99 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 6.99 6.91 0.08 0.00 100.00% 87.45% 636.13 17.19 10.42 0.28 37 37... Kf8 M 1 → 38... Qf4 30 10023 6.99 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 6.99 9.03 2.04 0.00 100.00% 86.36% 935.06 25.27 11.60 0.31
2 38 38. Rd7 M 1 → 38... Qf4 30 10023 6.99 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 6.99 6.87 0.12 0.00 100.00% 87.78% 636.13 16.74 10.42 0.27 38 38... Qxh2 M 3 → 39. Rf1+ 30 57407 8.97 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 6.99 7.97 ‑1.98 0.00 100.00% 86.72% 937.04 24.66 11.60 0.31
2 39 39. Ree7 M >4 → 39... h5 30 51525 6.87 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 8.97 7.40 ‑2.10 0.00 100.00% 88.09% 638.23 16.36 10.42 0.27 39 39... Qxg2 M 2 → 40... h5 30 65489 8.27 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 6.87 8.27 ‑1.40 0.00 100.00% 87.06% 938.44 24.06 11.60 0.30
2 40 40. Rb7 M 1 → 40... h5 30 65489 8.27 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 8.27 6.91 1.36 0.00 100.00% 88.39% 638.23 15.96 10.42 0.26 40 40... Rc5 M >4 → 41. Red7 30 241763 199.64 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 8.27 9.00 ‑191.37 0.00 100.00% 87.38% 1129.81 28.25 11.60 0.29
2 41 41. c7 M >4 → 41... Qxb7+ 30 173983 8.74 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 199.64 199.60 ‑190.90 0.00 100.00% 88.67% 829.13 20.22 10.42 0.25 41 41... Qg4 M >4 → 42. b4 30 57100 9.78 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 8.74 9.33 ‑1.04 0.00 100.00% 87.69% 1130.85 27.58 11.60 0.28
2 42 42. Rf7+ M >4 → 42... Kg8 30 67845 5.46 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 9.78 8.77 ‑4.32 0.00 100.00% 88.94% 833.45 19.84 10.42 0.25 42 42... Ke8 M 2 → 43. Re7+ 30 167973 42.92 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 5.46 42.92 ‑37.46 0.00 100.00% 87.99% 1168.31 27.82 11.60 0.28
2 43 43. b4 M 2 → 43... Rc4 30 145054 199.58 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 199.58 42.92 156.66 0.00 100.00% 89.20% 833.45 19.38 10.42 0.24 43 43... Rc2 M 4 → 44. Re7+ 30 83786 9.58 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 9.58 199.58 190.00 0.00 100.00% 88.26% 1168.31 27.17 11.60 0.27
2 44 44. a4 M 3 → 45... Kxf7 30 57054 9.91 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 9.91 9.58 0.33 0.00 100.00% 89.45% 833.45 18.94 10.42 0.24 44 44... h5 M 1 → 45... Kxf7 30 57054 9.91 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 9.91 11.83 1.92 0.00 100.00% 88.53% 1168.31 26.55 11.60 0.26
2 45 45. a5 M 1 → 45... Kxf7 30 57054 9.91 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 9.91 8.42 1.49 0.00 100.00% 89.68% 833.45 18.52 10.42 0.23 45 45... h4 M 2 → 46. c8=R+ 30 15767 199.75 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 9.91 199.75 ‑189.84 0.00 100.00% 88.79% 1358.15 30.18 11.60 0.26
2 46 46. b5 M 3 → 46... Rc4 30 100092 13.42 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 199.75 199.75 ‑186.33 0.00 100.00% 89.91% 1019.78 22.17 10.42 0.23 46 46... h3 M >4 → 47. Re7+ 30 97559 199.79 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 13.42 15.38 ‑186.37 0.00 100.00% 89.03% 1544.52 33.58 11.60 0.25
2 47 47. Nc6 M 2 → 47... Qc8+ 30 5147 199.74 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 199.79 199.74 ‑0.05 0.00 100.00% 90.12% 1019.83 21.70 10.42 0.22 47 47... h2 M >4 → 48. Re7+ 30 24205 299.95 M3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% ++- 100% 199.74 199.85 ‑100.21 0.00 100.00% 89.26% 1644.73 34.99 11.60 0.25
2 48 48. Rxg7 M 2 30 24205 299.88 M6 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% ++- 100% 299.96 M2 299.88 M6 ‑0.08 0.00 100.00% 90.33% 1019.91 21.25 10.42 0.22

⇑ game 2 — engine evaluated moves ⇑


⇓ game 2 — end ⇓


Christophe van de Loo ./. M Hesseling 
result: 1-0


game 2
statistics
type player White player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation 48 47
moves without precise engine evaluation
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00 26 24
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00 22 23
brilliant moves !! 4 7
impressive moves ! 1
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00 5 5
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00 31 26
questionable moves ?! 2 1
unsuitable moves ? 1
miserable moves ?? 6 6
extreme advantage — of White: ++- — of Black: --+ 22 11
moderate advantage — of White: ± — of Black: ∓ 1
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱ 2
balanced position — engine evaluation <> 0.00 — = 2 1
balanced position or draw — engine evaluation = 0.00 — = 6 5
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲ 2
clear disadvantage — of White: -+ — of Black: +- 2
extreme disadvantage — of White: --+ — of Black: ++- 15 26
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move« 299.88 M6 299.95 M3
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL« 100.0% 0.0%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL« 0.0% 0.0%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL« 0.0% 100.0%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol« ++- ++-
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result« 100% 100%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø« 90.33% 89.26%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute« 1019.91 1644.73
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute« 21.25 34.99
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant« 10.42 11.60
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant« 0.22 0.25
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis 48 47

⇑ game 2 — statistics ⇑